go to healthmatters home page

Serious coverage of today's health service and public health issues

Originally published in healthmatters issue 2, Autumn 1989, page 4
News

Cholesterol checks are unjustified

The American way of fighting heart disease through mass screening of cholesterol in the blood has been rejected by a recent report, just at the time some high-street retail chains were thinking of marketing over-the-counter tests. The report from King’s Fund consensus panel of ‘non-experts and dominated by non-medics’ could find no justification in checking everybody’s blood. Instead it has advocated a national strategy linking food supply with health, to reduce the general level of cholesterol in the population.

Current food policies the King’s Fund consensus panel said, either ignored the health issues or were detrimental to public health.

Producers were favoured over consumers, with, for example, the government avoiding policies that would promote semi-skimmed milk, because it feared the growth of another ‘butter mountain’.

The Department of Health is thought to favour mass screening, but has yet to rule officially on the cholesterol controversy.

Steve Iliffe

More from

More about

More by Steve Iliffe

Story search

 

Tip: use fewer, more specific words for a better search.

Feedback

What's your view on the issues raised here? Let us know what you think.

Send us your comments.

Get a free t-shirt!

Get a free t-shirt when you subscribe – or choose from our selection of free gifts

Choose a free gift when you subscribe

This page

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Creative Commons Licence

© healthmatters publications ltd.

Non-profitmaking and independent since 1988

INKhealthmatters is a member of INK, the Independent News Collective, trade association of the UK alternative press.

Last updated: 22 February 2007

XHTML1 | CSS2

RSS feed