go to healthmatters home page

Serious coverage of today's health service and public health issues

Originally published in healthmatters issue 36, Spring 1999, page 20
Review

Three wheels on my bandwagon

QUALITY, EVIDENCE AND EFFECTIVENESS IN HEALTH PROMOTION
Davies JK and MacDonald G
Routledge, 1998, £15.00

QUALITY, EVIDENCE AND EFFECTIVENESS IN HEALTH PROMOTION.

Davies JK and MacDonald G.

Routledge, 1998. £15.00.

Evidence-based healthcare has spawned three ‘schools’ of literature: enthusiastic advocacy, dismissive iconoclasm and opportunistic bandwagon jumping. This compilation, supported by an impressive international cast and edited by two noteworthy UK academics, is quite firmly in the third category.

Although this may seem harsh, given that evaluation in health promotion has a longer pedigree than that of evidence-based healthcare, sailing beneath a flag of convenience does risk running into the storm of readers’ expectations. Unfortunately this vessel’s hastily contrived bindings fail the test.

The book’s origin is a quality and effectiveness conference held in September 1996. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are dismissed in a sentence and acknowledgement of the activities of the Cochrane Collaboration (incorrectly called the International Cochrane Collaboration Institute here) is confined to a single paragraph.

This is particularly surprising given the Collaboration’s recent initiatives in this specific field. Even if one accepts, as I do, the premise that RCTs alone are inadequate for evaluating health promotion, this is a flimsy pretext for such cursory treatment.

Nor can the pace of development be held responsible for this lack as the book has an impressively up-to-date bibliography. The contributors seem willing to acknowledge the terminology but not the rationale of an evidence-based paradigm.

This is not by any means a poor book. On the contrary, chapters are written with an authority and clarity that makes it a very useful entrée into the field. It is difficult to identify significant omissions in terms of either activities or issues. Nevertheless, some of the approaches, such as checklists, summary tables and evaluations of studies, come tantalisingly close to being transferable to an evidence-based analysis.

Should a future edition of this valuable work complete this shift, I will be among the first to buy it.

Andrew Booth

More from

More about

More by Andrew Booth

Story search

 

Tip: use fewer, more specific words for a better search.

Feedback

What's your view on the issues raised here? Let us know what you think.

Send us your comments.

Get a free t-shirt!

Get a free t-shirt when you subscribe – or choose from our selection of free gifts

Choose a free gift when you subscribe

This page

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Creative Commons Licence

© healthmatters publications ltd.

Non-profitmaking and independent since 1988

INKhealthmatters is a member of INK, the Independent News Collective, trade association of the UK alternative press.

Last updated: 22 February 2007

XHTML1 | CSS2

RSS feed